|
July 03, 2003No troops to Liberia, please
Bush weighs sending troops to Liberia President Bush is expected to decide today whether to send U.S. troops to Liberia to lead peacekeeping efforts, a move opposed by Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld and top brass at the Pentagon.[Thank you, Rummy!--Jen] So...put the two events together of this civil war over Taylor and the one that preceded it and Liberia's basically been fighting over this for the last 14 years at least, but they appear to need US help now? Please don't send our Marines, President Bush! Not only is the "fun meter pegged" for our armed forces at the moment, but if we send troops to Liberia, why shouldn't we send them to the Congo, the Ivory Coast, Nigeria's had some problems...the Central African Republic, Sudan's had a brutal civil war, etc., etc., etc. If only Bush didn't have this Africa trip scheduled. And right after his birthday on Sunday, too. I'm sure we all wish the good people of Liberia well and we don't want any more innocents to die, but we don't have limitless troops or the inclination to commit them wherever and whenever there's trouble. Besides, France, Kofi Annan and Dimocrat Prez candidate Howard Dean all like the idea of sending our soldiers there, so I know it's got to be terrible. It has the potential to be a real Mogadishu-like quagmire and I think that's why these Lefties like it so. Sounds like a job for those UN blue helmets, if you ask me! (For once.)
|