|
May 09, 2004Cherchez la...leak.
All you need to know about the Abu Ghraib scandal is one name: Hackworth. Soldier's Family Set in Motion Chain of Events on Disclosure Ivan Frederick was distraught. His son, an Army reservist turned prison guard in Iraq, was under investigation earlier this year for mistreating prisoners, and photographs of the abuse were beginning to circulate among soldiers and military investigators. Don't know who Hack is? Lucky you. He did 5 tours of duty in Vietnam, then quit the armed forces and began to oppose that war, the WOT and anything involving the Pentagon ever since. (Remind you of anyone that's currently running for President?) In fact, he even wrote a book about how he felt about the Vietnam War called "About Face" in which he criticized the military for the way the war was being "run." (Word has it that Hack was bitter he'd never been promoted to General--that's because he was a grandstander and a hot dog--and left to complain.) And the Colonel's had a hate on for Donald Rumsfeld for a long time and has lately taken to calling Rummy an "asshole" in Slate Magazine interview and on TV. The Abu Ghraib scandal isn't his first time to his dance with the media, however. When CNN/Time's star reporter Peter Arnett broke a "story" about an alleged war atrocity that took place in Laos in 1970 during the Vietnam war, it was Hackworth, curiously, who came forward to defend the soldiers' side of the story. Arnett reported that he had "proof" that U.S. soldiers in Laos in 1970 had used poison gas on American "defectors", and Laotian noncombatants (of which the report maintained there were "many" which of course later proved to be false) during Operation Tailwind. The story got lots of airplay on CNN. More anguish, which Vietnam tales of alleged war crimes always seem to bring, followed until the story was finally and inevitably disproven and dismissed. Arnett, who had put CNN in the forefront of American TV with his "Live from Baghdad" coverage for them during the onset of Gulf War I and who was considered a "star," was fired from CNN for peddling the story.* (*Why would CNN run with such an inflammatory, but unsubstantiated, story about Vietnam "war crimes?" Well, at the time, Ted Turner was married to anti-war activist "Hanoi" Jane Fonda.) Baghdad Peter was not to turn up on America's radar again until the launch of Operation Iraqi Freedom, reporting the war from Baghdad again for MSNBC, when it became clear that his bias was all-too-biased in favor of Saddam Hussein. Arnett was summarily fired again in the middle of the invasion and turned up briefly still reporting from Baghad for London's lurid tabloid "The Daily Mirror," which not coincidentally was one of the first "papers" to carry the Abu Ghraib pictures and which is still peddling the story today, an attempt to suck in British soldiers in Iraq into the scandal. [Don't forget to click on the link for Arnett's Daily Mirror op ed "This war is not working," datelined Baghdad on April 1,2003, 8 days before Saddam's statue was pulled down!--J.T.] The blogosphere should recall that the Daily Mirror is also the press home of Mr. "I'd beat me up, too, if I were you," John Pilger. I'm sure that while many of you were reading this, bells of remembrance were going off. |