|
July 09, 2004Lileks on Iranian nukes (and Barbie and melon vodka and Star Trek)
James has been doing some outstanding writing, as always, but today's Bleat is particularly good (as was yesterday's on Michael Moore) on the solution to the problem of Iranian nuclear saber rattling:
I know *this American* would, but I don't think we should depend on the Israelis to take care of those Iranian nuke bomb factories for us if for no other reason than that this is everyone's problem and also because the Iranians are thought to have at least 3 nuclear plants with most of the structures hidden underground, it may not be possible for Israel to pull an "Osirak" type hit on Iran and end the problem all by themselves. Lileks then goes on to opine in a "wish it away" kind of fashion: We’ll see. When it comes to Iran, I fear that either the bombs get bombed or the bombs get used. The latter is what I always thought would be the end result of the forces set in motion by 9/11, and I still hope I am wrong. I’ve been wrong enough to be hopeful. I'm afraid he's right about the "bomb them or get bombed" opinion and it very well may come to that. Our only other alternatives are a military invasion to effect régime change as we did with Iraq or in the apparently least likely, but cheeriest, scenario, the people of Iran will overthrow the mullahs in a popular uprising and voluntarily dismantle the nukes. Let's follow James, then and hope and pray for that.
|